Courtesty Progressive Georgraphies, Pléyade has a special issue on biopolitics.
Rick and I hate this phrase and now he’s put out a longer argument why: “It is what it is” or things T. W. Adorno would have hated | environmental critique. Here’s Rick:
People probably can’t help the occasional recourse to banal tautologies. Phrases like “it is what it is” have a certain sports radio, ‘works in almost any conversation’ kind of appeal. It’s like describing a team as “strong up front” or affirming a statement with “you can’t stop a train.” No one really knows exactly what you mean, but it sounds just concrete enough that everyone goes home happy. Yet, what’s truly pernicious about this phrase and what connects it to Adorno’s work isn’t that it’s tautological or unimaginative, but rather that it is a shorthand way of naturalizing the current state of the world.
Stephanie DeGooyer reviews Vita Activa: The Spirit of Hannah Arendt, finding it too often puts her thought and actions in the relation to the men in her life, a move oft-repeated by those Heideggerians all-too-interested in her affair with Heidegger and its affect on her thought: The Philosopher and Her Kisses – Los Angeles Review of Books
An excellent commentary at the Society and Space open site by Brian Jorden Jefferson on Policing, Whiteness, and the Death-Wage | Society and space This follows another contribution at S&S on Black Lives Matter: Deborah Cowen and Nemoy Lewis’ Anti-blackness and urban geopolitical economy: Reflections on Ferguson and the suburbanization of the ‘internal colony’.
Jeff Malplas and Ingo Farin edited the collection, which contains a cast of many well-known Heidegger specialists. It is, on the whole, more sympathetic to Heidegger (or what is culled down as his real thought, rather than the anti-semitism) than I expected: Ingo Farin, Jeff Malpas (Eds.): Reading Heidegger’s Black Notebooks 1931-1941 – Phenomenological Reviews